Compass reads every evaluation a resident received this period and gives your committee one screen per resident: concerns first, the evidence behind each sub-competency, and what the evaluations leave out. Your committee sets every Milestone.
Pilot starting with a mid-year CCC Built for ACGME Milestones 2.0.
Needed reminders to follow up on pending labs before sign-out.Attending, inpatient rotation · and a senior resident, same month
Compass committee view, previewed with a fictional resident.
Every concern an evaluator wrote is surfaced and quoted, with who wrote it and when. Only a person can clear one.
Each sub-competency shows what evaluators actually described, in their own words, so Milestones are set from evidence, not memory.
Sub-competencies no one described this period, and evaluations too thin to count, show up as gaps, so you know whom to ask.
Exports from the evaluation system you already use, mapped once at setup. No new forms for faculty to fill out.
Your specialty’s Milestones are built in. Each finding links to the evaluation comment it came from.
Compass never sets a Milestone level and never writes an evaluation. It prepares the evidence; your CCC decides.
Which residents have concerns to review, which evaluations are still missing before the meeting, and which evaluators write too little to help.
What evaluators noticed, and growth areas worded as feedback to discuss. Residents see only what your program chooses to release.
Tell us about your program and your next committee meeting. We’ll show you Compass on fictional residents first, and answer your data questions before anything real is uploaded.